
![]() |
North Central Regional
Extension Publication NCR #552 |
Pharming is the production of human pharmaceuticals in farm animals that is presently in the development stage with possible commercialization by the year 2000. It has been gaining application among biotechnologists since the development of transgenic "super mice" in 1982 and the development of the first mice to produce a human drug, tPA (tissue plasminogen activator to treat blood clots), in 1987. Transgenic organisms have been modified by genetic engineering to contain DNA from an external source. The first drugs produced by this approach are about to enter clinical trials as part of the FDA review process. These transgenic animals will likely be raised by the pharmaceutical companies and will certainly be kept separate from the food supply.
By genetic engineering, the DNA gene for a protein drug of interest can be transferred into another organism that will produce large amounts of the drug. This technique (illustrated in Figure 1), can be used to impart new production characteristics to an organism, as well as to trigger the production of a protein drug:

The first successful products of the genetic engineering process were protein drugs like insulin and growth hormone. These drugs do not have to be produced by mammals to be active in mammals. An inexpensive, easy-to-grow culture of genetically engineered bacteria like the common E. coli can manufacture these protein drugs.
Other human drugs, such as tPA for blood clots, erythropoietin for anemia, and blood clotting factors VIII and IX for hemophilia, require modifications that only cells of higher organisms like mammals can provide. The higher costs of maintaining mammalian cell cultures that produce only small amounts of the drugs have been an enormous barrier to the commercial development of this type of cell culture production method.
For certain protein drugs that require complex modifications or are needed in large supply, production in transgenic animals seems most efficient. The farm animal becomes a production facility with many advantages-it is reproducible, has a flexible production capacity through the number of animals bred, and maintains its own fuel supply. Best of all, in most animal drug production, the drug is delivered from the animal in a very convenient form-in the milk!
The current strategy to achieve these objectives is to couple the DNA
gene for the protein drug with a DNA signal directing production in the
mammary gland. The new gene, while present in every cell of the animal,
functions only in the mammary gland so the protein drug is made only
in the milk. Since the mammary gland and milk are essentially "outside"
the main life support systems of the animal, there is virtually no
danger of disease or harm to the animal in making the "foreign" protein
drug.
After the DNA gene for the protein drug has been coupled with the mammary directing signal, this DNA is injected into fertilized cow, sheep, goat, or mouse embryos with the aid of a very fine needle, a tool called a micromanipulator, and a microscope (Figure 2). The injected embryos are then implanted into recipient surrogate mothers where, hopefully, they survive and are born normally.

Although most protein drugs are made in milk, a notable exception is human hemoglobin that is being made in swine blood to provide a blood substitute for human transfusions. Because hemoglobin is naturally a blood protein, it is likely to be one of few exceptions to the usual method of production in milk. Furthermore, the economics of blood production are less favorable, because to recover human hemoglobin, the animal producing it must be slaughtered.
Drugs currently made by or being developed in transgenic animals are listed in Table 1. Notice that pharming is expected to increase the value of animals dramatically. In general, animal pharming is considered to be 5 to 10 times more economical on a continuing basis and 2 to 3 times cheaper in start-up costs than cell culture production methods.
At a more fundamental level, many people are genuinely concerned about
animal welfare and biotechnology's redefinition of the relationship between
humans and
animals. Genetic engineering andtransgenic animal research are essentially
human endeavors to improve the availability, quality, and safety of drugs;
to enhance human
health; and to improve animal health. Animal breeding has gone on for
centuries, but the ability to change the DNA of the animal brings breeding
to a revolutionary new level.

"See How They (Don't) Grow." Successful Farming. March 1991, p. 33.
"Transgenic Animals in the Production of Therapeutic Proteins." Biotechnology International. Century Press, 1992, p. 317.
"Transgenic Pharming Advances." Bio/Technology. May 1992, P. 498.
"Whole Animals for Wholesale Protein Production." Bio / Technology.
August 1992, p. 863.
![]() |
Written by David F. Betsch, Ph.D., Biotechnology Training Programs, Inc. Edited by Glenda D. Webber, Iowa State University Office of Biotechnology. |
North Central Regional Extension Publications are subject to peer review
and prepared as a part of the Cooperative Extension activities of the 13
land-grant universities of the 12 North Central States, in cooperation
with the Extension Service - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington,
D.C. The following states cooperated in making this publication available.
| University of Illinois
69 Mumford Hall 1301 W. Gregory Drive Urbana, IL 61801 217-333-2007 |
University of Minnesota
3 Coffey Hall St. Paul, MN 55108 612-625-8173 |
University of Wisconsin
Ag. Bulletin, Rm. 245 30 N. Murray St. Madison, WI 53715 608-262-3346 |
| * Iowa State University
119 Printing & Publ. Bldg. Ames, IA 50011-1050 515-294-5247 |
University of Missouri
115 S. Fifth St. Columbia, MO 65211 314-681-5557 |
Lincoln University 900
Moreau Drive Jefferson City, MO 65101 314-882-2792 |
|
Michigan State University
|
Programs and activities of the cooperative Extension Service are available to all potential clientele without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion or disability.
In cooperation with NCR Educational Materials Project
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Cooperative Extension Services of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota and Wisconsin. Robert M. Anderson, Jr., Director, Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Printed and distributed in cooperation with Extension Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C., and the Cooperative Extension Services of Colorado, Maine, Nevada, and Oklahoma.